ERP Software Logo

Microsoft Dynamics vendors provide comparisons and opinions to professionals in the ERP/Accounting software selection process

 
 

Peter Joeckel, TurnOnDynamics

Simple Rule for Selecting Microsoft Dynamics AX


    Email | Print

    Is AX (formerly Axapta) your best Microsoft Dynamics ERP option? Use the "Rule of Multies" to find out.

    The question often arises as to when it is appropriate to go with Microsoft Dynamics AX as opposed to another ERP offering in the Microsoft stable of software solutions.Of course the answer is complex and requires a detailed analysis of not only your functional business requirements and ability to implement what is essentially now a tier one business solution, but also a willingness to make the major financial investment required for this type of system. But what if you just want a "rough idea" of whether or not to go the AX route? In my years of evaluating ERP solutions I have found that a useful method of deciding if AX is a potential solution is the "Rule of Multies".

    Each of the following “Multies” that you can check off of your functional requirements list is another step towards AX being the best solution in the Microsoft ERP world:

    • Multi Company
    • Multi LOB (line of business)
    • Multi Location
    • Multi-Currency
    • Multi Country
    • Multi Language
    • Multi-Dimensional Inventory or Financials

    The more line items you check off the more certain it becomes that AX should seriously be considered and in some instances AX will turn out to be the only logical solution.

    While there is endless debate in the reseller community as to the relative merits of Microsoft Dynamics AX versus NAV (and in some cases even GP) anyone with a real understanding of the functionality, technology and most importantly the relative resource commitment of Microsoft to the various ERP offerings, understands that AX is the premier product in its ERP line of products, the flagship ERP solution. To insist otherwise indicates a complete lack of understanding of the ERP products and of Microsoft’s direction.

    The "Rule of Multies" as outlined above will rapidly begin to differentiate the field between product lines, and in some cases decide on a clear direction.

    Multi Company and multi-location can go hand in hand but do not necessarily have to as in the case of a business that runs multiple lines of business or companies out of the same location. Especially noteworthy is the case where there are multiple production facilities or warehouses that create a supply chain.

    Multiple currency, country, and language often go hand in hand but of course do not have to. Business regulations and tax considerations are usually found to be critical in companies with these requirements.

    Not as straightforward or common is the requirement for multidimensional inventory or financial reporting. In many ways I find these to be the most challenging of the "Multiess" to understand and therefore the most difficult to implement. A case study based on one of these scenarios will highlight my next post.

    Peter Joeckel is the President and Founder of TurnOnDynamics a Microsoft Dynamics GP, NAV and AX (formerly Great Plains, Navison and Axapta respectively) partner servicing the Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Arkansas (TOLA) firms. TurnOnDynamics focuses on the strategic concerns of executives and owners with a unique Dynamic CFO Service.

    by TurnOnDynamics

    One Response to “Simple Rule for Selecting Microsoft Dynamics AX”

    1. Renown says:

      Great post.

      Renown is asked this question constantly – Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. GP etc.

      The Prospects budget also needs to be a factor in the decision.

      Dynamics AX is certainly the most configurable solution of the 4 ERP packages, but with configurability comes complexity and implementation cost, as well as risk. BUT, I have seen cases where a client has gone for a “cheaper” option, then spent money on development that they would not have had to do if they had chosen Microsoft Dynamics AX, so a balanced view is needed and prospective clients need to be educated to consider this.

      Microsoft also has it’s own positioning of the products. We wrote a page on it, (including Microsoft’s own positioning);

      http://www.renown.com.au/MicrosoftDynamics/Dynamics_AX/Dynamics_AX_vs.aspx

      If you want to know more about Microsoft Dynamics AX 2012, I have that:
      http://www.renown.com.au/MicrosoftDynamics/Dynamics_AX.aspx

      Hope this helps
      Michael

    Ask This Expert a Question / Leave a Comment

     

     
     
    Show Buttons
    Hide Buttons