<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Which Microsoft Dynamics ERP Software Solution Is Right For Your Industry?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.erpsoftwareblog.com/2009/12/which-microsoft-dynamics-erp-software-solution-is-right-for-your-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.erpsoftwareblog.com/2009/12/which-microsoft-dynamics-erp-software-solution-is-right-for-your-industry/</link> <description>Microsoft Dynamics vendors provide comparisons and opinions to professionals in the ERP/Accounting software selection process</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:12:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Michael Camp</title><link>http://www.erpsoftwareblog.com/2009/12/which-microsoft-dynamics-erp-software-solution-is-right-for-your-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-1463</link> <dc:creator>Michael Camp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:43:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.erpsoftwareblog.com/?p=2315#comment-1463</guid> <description>The overlap in the functionality of the 4 products doesn&#039;t mean there is optimal functionality. I would also question the accuracy of the chart you cite. For example, Dynamics SL is clearly best for project-driven organizations, hence Microsoft and SL partners focus on mid-size engineering, architecture, construction, research, pharmaceutical, and IT firms, in addition to professional services. Also, the chart does not list SL in manufacturing, but clearly SL is superior for make-to-order manufacturers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The overlap in the functionality of the 4 products doesn&#8217;t mean there is optimal functionality. I would also question the accuracy of the chart you cite. For example, Dynamics SL is clearly best for project-driven organizations, hence Microsoft and SL partners focus on mid-size engineering, architecture, construction, research, pharmaceutical, and IT firms, in addition to professional services. Also, the chart does not list SL in manufacturing, but clearly SL is superior for make-to-order manufacturers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.erpsoftwareblog.com @ 2012-02-09 12:28:04 -->
